Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Bradshaw v. Bryant et al
as 1:2010cv00336
Plaintiff:
Michael Bradshaw
Defendant:
Dolph Bryant, Minnie Fox and Kathlene Oneal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Bryant et al
as 1:2010cv00328
Plaintiff:
Floyd Robinson
Defendant:
Dalph Bryant and Jimmy Vouhn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. City of Leland et al
as 4:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Imogene Watson
Defendant:
City of Leland , Flasco Bryant and Eddie B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stubbs v. City of Tupelo, Mississippi
as 1:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Bryant V. Stubbs, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Tupelo, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Quitman County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kay Pruitt
Defendant:
Quitman County, Mississippi, Oliver Parker, Quitman County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Dr. Bryant Hirsberg, D.M.D., Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tynia A. Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Bryant Hirsberg, D.M.D., Inc. and Bryant Hirsberg, D.M.D
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Watson v. City of Leland et al
as 4:2008cv00161
Plaintiff:
Imogene Watson
Defendant:
City of Leland, Flasco Bryant and Eddie B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen et al v. Schafer, et al
as 4:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Allen, James Allen, James Allen and others
Defendant:
Ed Schafer and The United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Harris v. Bryant
as 1:2008cv00223
Petitioner:
Ronnie Harris
Respondent:
Dolph Bryant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vaughn v. King et al
as 2:2006cv00213
Petitioner:
Bryant Vaughn
Respondent:
King, King, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
