Cases 1 - 10 of 308
United States of America v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leatrice Scooter Jones
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laracheal Jones
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamie Jones
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Rutledge et al v. Case
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Stewart Rutledge, Britton Jones and Len Reeves
Defendant:
David Case
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Toy v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Tameka Jones, Abraham Gates, Humphreys County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. USA
as 4:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Derrick Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. United Services Automobile Association
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
James H. Jones
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jones v. Thompson Machinery Commerce Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Bill Jones
Defendant:
Thompson Machinery Commerce Corporation, John Doe Entities 1-5 and John Doe Persons 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Vital Core et al
as 4:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
LeByron Jones
Respondent:
Vital Core, Dr. LeFleur, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
