Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Barber
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickham v. Tilley et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Wickham
Defendant:
Thomas Michael Tilley, GTG Logistics, Inc. doing business as Amazon and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Anthony Smith
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Williams
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Cheney v. Taylor Machine Works, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cheney
Defendant:
Taylor Machine Works, Inc., John Does 1-5 and John Doe Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Malone v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Malone, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Trinity Food Service and Tallahatchie CCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
