Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Glaser v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 3:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Rena Drew Glaser
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Randy McCoy, John Doe Corporations 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Drew v. Tippah County et al
as 3:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Candace Milam Drew
Defendant:
Tippah County, Tippah County Sheriff's Department, Karl Gaillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Tallahatchie County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00036
Defendant:
West Tallahatchie School District, Tallahatchie County, Mississippi, Tallahatchie Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner et al v. Grenada County, MS
as 4:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Drew Joyner, Beverly Buonviri and Frank K. Joyner
Defendant:
Corrections Management Services, Inc. (CMS), Grenada County, Mississippi, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akin v. Wells et al
as 3:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ashley Akin
Defendant:
Carco International, Inc., Carco Rentals, Inc., Gerald Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtiss et al v. McCoy et al
as 1:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Andrew Drew Curtiss , Jesse Don Curtis , Jordan Tyler Curtiss and others
Defendant:
Rusty McCoy, Brian Mays, City of Booneville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crop Production Services, Inc. v. Burns
as 2:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
Crop Production Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Drew Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luckett et al v. Lucas et al
as 4:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Darius Luckett and John Thigpen
Defendant:
Edward Dwight Lucas and Drew, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. Drew Municipal Separ
Plaintiff:
Larry Carter
Defendant:
The Drew Municipal Separate School District
Objector:
Citizens of Drew School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
