Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gunn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Shenvora Gunn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Robertson et al v. American Municipal Services Corporation
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tradeca Robertson and Michael Gunn
Defendant:
American Municipal Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gunn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 1:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Doris Louise Gunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
USA v. Montgomery County School District et al
as 3:1967cv00020
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Montgomery County School District , Clyde A. Gibson, Elmo Branch and others
Intervenor:
Philip Gunn , Tate Reeves , Rosemary Aultman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butts et al v. Gunn et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Butts , Kimberly Butts , Sharron Butts and others
Defendant:
Philip Gunn , Tate Reeves , Rosemary Aultman and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gunn v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Tywana Gail Gunn
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gunn v. Sparkman et al
as 2:2011cv00218
Petitioner:
Timothy Gunn
Respondent:
Emmitt Sparkman and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
