Cases 51 - 60 of 61
O'Connor v. Simpson County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2011cv00497
Plaintiff:
Marty O'Connor
Defendant:
Simpson County, Mississippi , Kenneth Lewis and John Does A, B and C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Slone v. Jackson Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv00425
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Slone, Sr.
Defendant:
Jackson Police Department and Tyrone Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Rutland et al v. McMillin et al
as 3:2008cv00763
Plaintiff:
Jackie Rutland, Jackie Rutland, Michael Shane Deaton and others
Defendant:
Malcolm McMillin, Hinds County, Mississippi, Greg Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00322
Plaintiff:
Jean A. Anderson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Don Lewis and M. Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Depree v. Saunders et al
as 2:2007cv00185
Plaintiff:
Chauncey M. Depree, Jr., Chauncey M. Depree, Jr. and Chauncey M. Depree, Jr.
Defendant:
Martha Saunders, Darrell J. Grimes, Alvin J. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
