Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Colina v. Gillis
as 5:2020cv00012
Respondent:
Shawn R. Gillis
Petitioner:
Alvarez Colina Jaime Ramon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castro v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
Christian Castro
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
William P. Joyce and Warden, Adams County Shawn R. Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reeves v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Secretary Unknown, Attorney General William P. Barr, Stanley Crocket and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Clovis Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Attorney General W. B. Barr, U.S. ICE Field Officer Director, Warden Shawn R. Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Inderjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alvarez v. McAleenan et al
as 5:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SHAWN GILLIS and others
Plaintiff:
Josep Ramirez Alvarez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Okorafor v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00120
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Heanyi Joseph Okorafor
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Shawn R. Gillis, John-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simoza Rangel v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Julio Jesus Simoza Rangel
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Shawn R. Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. GILLIS
as 5:2019cv00117
Plaintiff:
Juan Diego Ferrer Rodriguez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
SHAWN GILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kumar v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00116
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Shawn R. Gillis
Plaintiff:
Manoj Kumar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zavala v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00115
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Zavala
Defendant:
Shawn R. Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
