Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Havens v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2019cv00870
Defendant:
N.P. R. King, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Roger Wayne Havens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Uknown Gills, Connie Pierce, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Pierce
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Nickson et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Darrin Dieuntay Wilson
Defendant:
Unknown Nickson, Unknown Hogdon, Unknown Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. 1st Case, Facts of Indigent Appeals et al
as 4:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Pierce
Defendant:
1st Case, Facts of Indigent Appeals, 2nd Case of ARP and Use of Camera at EMCF run by MTC Management Training Corporation, East Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. USA
as 3:2012cv00384
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Warren Clifton Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Galloway v. Epps et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Galloway
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Officials of Stone County Miss. Corr. Facility, Unknown Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Pierce et al
as 4:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Antwon Griffin
Defendant:
Unknown Pierce, Daniel Baker and Unknown Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Pierce et al
as 2:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dean Scott Ballard
Defendant:
Connie Pierce, Debra Platt, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
