Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Ingram et al v. Marion County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Michael Ingram, Jr. and Felicia Ingram
Defendant:
Marion County, Mississippi, Glenn Alton Lowery, Sr., Andrew Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow et al v. Korkren et al
as 1:2014cv00132
Plaintiff:
Tonya Barrow and James Barrow
Defendant:
John Korkren, Rustic Inn, Safeway Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. Premier Home Furnishings et al
as 2:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Francisco Chomyo Garcia, II
Defendant:
Premier Home Furnishings , Terry Hood, Houston Wood Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Howard v. Moore et al
as 3:2012cv00424
Plaintiff:
Renetta Vance Howard and Veionisia Vance
Defendant:
Jerry Moore , Doe Defendants 1-10, Precious T. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
5K Farms, Inc. v. Powerscreen Crushing and Screening, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
5K Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
Powerscreen Crushing and Screening, LLC, Terex Corporation and John Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stovall v. The City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2010cv00084
Plaintiff:
Curtis Stovall
Defendant:
The City of Hattiesburg , City of Hattiesburg Police Department , Frazier Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell et al v. Texaco, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Vernita Bell, Vernita Bell, Vernita Bell and others
Defendant:
Texaco, Inc., Texaco, Inc., Texaco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
