Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Loevel-Salazar v. Warden F.C.I Yazoo City Medium
as 3:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Pedro Pablo Loevel-Salazar
Defendant:
Warden F.C.I Yazoo City Medium
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00044
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00142
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salazar-Trivino v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS SALAZAR-TRIVINO
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
ELDER NEHEMIAS LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JHAIR GENEROSO PATERNINA-CHRISTOPHER and others
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skinner v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manuel Skinner
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and J. Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
