Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 135
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner: Darnell William King
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff: Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant: E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. King et al
as 5:2023ct03317
Plaintiff: Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant: Jordan B. King, Robert Evans, Joel G. Stadiem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrae v. King
as 5:2023ct03082
Plaintiff: Samuel McCrae, III
Defendant: Paula Lichelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez-Rocha v. King
as 5:2023hc02026
Petitioner: Jose Gomez-Rocha
Respondent: Malinda L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McAllister v. Pender County Jail et al
as 5:2022ct03363
Plaintiff: Gordon Tyrone McAllister
Defendant: Pender County Jail, Medical Staff and FNU King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. King
as 5:2022hc02164
Petitioner: Tawoine Banks
Respondent: Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nye v. King et al
as 5:2022ct03337
Plaintiff: Jarad Nye
Defendant: FNU King, M.D. FNU LNU, Tracy LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ramos
as 5:2022hc02154
Petitioner: Daniel H. King
Respondent: Warden R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. King et al
as 5:2022hc02140
Petitioner: Alex Gonzalez
Respondent: Malinda L. King and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?