Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Clark v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
John R. Clark
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, City of Charlotte and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Parrish, et al v. Ace Relocation Systems, Inc., et al
as 7:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
John H. Parrish and Phyllis D. Parrish
Defendant:
Ace Relocation Systems, Inc. and Atlas Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Horton et al v. Fussell
as 7:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Hugh Horton, Danny Fryar, Michael Fryar and others
Defendant:
Timothy Fussell
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Perry et al v. CRI Properties, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
John Perry and Alexander Perry
Defendant:
CRI Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
Richardson v. Lopez et al
as 5:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Richardson
Defendant:
Raul Lopez, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Spivey
as 2:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
JOHN GORDON
Defendant:
GORDEN W. SPIVEY, ESQ. and Gorden W. Spivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory v. Harris et al
as 4:2020cv00084
Defendant:
The State Bar of California, M. Aaron Persky, John C. Glaser and others
Plaintiff:
Jeane Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOLT Power, LLC v. Butts et al
as 7:2019cv00149
Defendant:
John Berkner, William "Billy&quo Butts and William "Billy" Butts
Plaintiff:
VOLT POWER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laake v. Lulu Enterprises, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
John Laake
Defendant:
Lulu Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Frink v. Best Rate Funding Corp. et al
as 7:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lyndon F. Frink
Defendant:
Best Rate Funding Corp., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Brock & Scott, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
