Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Kebort et al v. Stiehl et al
as 5:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
Nancy H. Kebort and B.H.K.
Defendant:
Robert Stiehl, James Cooke, Margit Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raleigh Wake Citizens Association et al v. Barefoot et al
as 5:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Raleigh Wake Citizens Association , Jannet B. Barnes , Beverley S. Clark and others
Defendant:
Chad Barefoot, Philip E. Berger, Tim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark, III v. McHugh
as 5:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Herbert Clark, III
Defendant:
John M. McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wright et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Calla Wright , Willie J. Bethel , Amy T. Lee and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Wake County Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Costilla v. Everett
as 4:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Juan Costilla
Defendant:
Clark Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. The Carolina Inn at Village Green et al
as 5:2013cv00306
Plaintiff:
Lona E. Clark
Defendant:
The Carolina Inn at Village Green, Stephen Gentzler and Lindsey Palaez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
