Cases 31 - 40 of 4,343
Elabanjo v. Griffith et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Samantha Elabanjo
Defendant:
B. W. Griffith and Lawrence Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McClary v. Worldwide Clinical Trials, Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 5:24-CV-227-D-KS
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Donita McClary
Defendant:
Worldwide Clinical Trials, Inc. and Marie Simerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 222 Telecommunications Act of 1996
Ferguson v. Credit One LLC
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Ferguson
Defendant:
Credit One LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hubbard v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Union County Prosecutor's Office, Elizabeth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ragland v. NC Division of Employment Security
as 5:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kimarlo Ragland
Defendant:
NC Division of Employment Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
