Cases 101 - 110 of 187
Fogel v. Harrison et al
as 5:2015ct03084
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Fogel
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , Michael Ramirez , Joshua Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. U.S. District Court et al
as 5:2015ct03077
Plaintiff:
Monterius R. Smith
Defendant:
U.S. District Court and John H. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Buencamino v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03307
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Buencamino
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huggins v. Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2014ct03288
Plaintiff:
Erik G. Huggins
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department, Bryan S. Smith, Harry Robins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matherly et al v. Holder et al
as 5:2014ct03284
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shane Matherly and Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Sylvia Matthews-Burwell, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gerrick v. Perry
as 5:2014hc02222
Petitioner:
Bruce H. Gerrick
Respondent:
Frank L. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellerbee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03274
Plaintiff:
Derric Ellerbee
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuels, H. Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gerrick v. N.C. Legislation et al
as 5:2014cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bruce H. Gerrick
Defendant:
N.C. Legislation, Cumberland County Municipality, Clerk of Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Holder et al
as 5:2014ct03255
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Sylvia Matthews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014hc02204
Petitioner:
Edwin H. Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Congress and United States Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
