Cases 141 - 150 of 14,446
Cunningham v. USA
as 5:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Charles Muhammad Cunningham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Miller v. USA
as 4:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Terrence Denon Miller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Amadi v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02060
Petitioner:
Okechukwu Desmond Amadi
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department et al
as 5:2024ct03068
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department, City of Windsor, Bertie County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03066
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Sergeant Randle, Unit Manager Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03067
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ellis
Defendant:
Todd Ishee and Susan Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Transport Driver
as 5:2024ct03070
Plaintiff:
Dondell C. Davidson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Federal Bureau of Prisons Transport Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chavis v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03069
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ryan Chavis
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coble v. Blackburn
as 5:2024ct03065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Coble
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Brian Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner:
Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent:
Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
