Cases 11 - 20 of 14,445
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02103
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02102
Petitioner:
James Long and James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neal v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal and Christopher Lee Neal
Defendant:
RN Teresa Carter, P.A. Erica Kearney, Nurse Cora Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guin v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02076
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guin, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Adult Corrections and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02100
Petitioner:
Ruben Fuller
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whitehurst v. Lewis et al
as 5:2024ct03136
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Timothy L. Lewis, Mashell L. Wilson and Sgt. D. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate
as 5:2024ct03137
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
