Cases 31 - 40 of 14,488
O'Neil v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02113
Petitioner:
David O'Neil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Butler v. North Carolina General Court of Justice et al
as 5:2024ct03151
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
North Carolina General Court of Justice and Lisa Scales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Buffaloe, Jr. et al
as 5:2024ct03149
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe, Jr., Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02112
Petitioner:
Stephen Brooks
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 5:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Nashiem Malik Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
James v. USA
as 7:2024cv00466
Petitioner:
Bennie Lee James
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prince v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02111
Petitioner:
Reginald L. Prince
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Columbus County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2024ct03147
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Columbus County Sheriff's Office and Jail Detention Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
