Cases 41 - 50 of 14,481
Gause v. Covington et al
as 5:2024ct03143
Plaintiff:
Walter Timothy Gause
Defendant:
Captain Ronald Covington, Unit Manager Nealey, S Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 5:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Baby D
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ainscough v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02104
Petitioner:
Jared Ainscough
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bastas v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02105
Petitioner:
Andreas Peter Bastas
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Petitioner:
Antwarn Lee Rogers
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Darren G. Jackson, Graham H. Atkinson, Gregory K. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02103
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02102
Petitioner:
James Long and James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neal v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal and Christopher Lee Neal
Defendant:
RN Teresa Carter, P.A. Erica Kearney, Nurse Cora Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
