Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Meeks v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011ct03157
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Meeks
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction and Don Eddins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Best et al
as 5:2011ct03091
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Best and North Carolina Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Branker et al
as 5:2011ct03071
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
G. J. Branker, North Carolina Department of Correction, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. North Carolina Department of Correction
as 5:2011hc02052
Petitioner:
Jakiem Lance Wilson
Respondent:
North Carolina Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bauberger v. Haynes et al
as 5:2011ct03032
Plaintiff:
William Bauberger
Defendant:
Grady Haynes, Arthur Davis, Sampson Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010ct03224
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
Department of Correction, J.N. Vaughan, Officer Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010ct03197
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Daniels
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction and Brunswick County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaborn v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010hc02230
Petitioner:
Joseph Seaborn
Respondent:
Department of Correction, Alvin Keller and Oliver Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baggett v. Keller et al
as 5:2010hc02226
Petitioner:
William Baggett
Respondent:
Alvin Keller, Joseph Hall and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010hc02228
Petitioner:
LeRoy Richardson
Respondent:
Department of Correction, Alvin Keller and Herbert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
