Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Deal v. Department of Prison Records et al
as 5:2018ct03086
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Prison Records, Health Department Records, Department of Prison Combined Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Easley et al
as 5:2018ct03077
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Easley, Beverly Perdue, Pat McCrory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Butler et al
as 5:2015ct03274
Plaintiff:
Ferris R. Langley
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Butler et al
as 5:2014ct03142
Plaintiff:
David Earl Jones
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012ct03242
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Young
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Beverly Perdue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Perrit et al
as 5:2012hc02125
Petitioner:
Lewis Pickett
Respondent:
Brad Perrit, Reuben Young and Beverly Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2011ct03258
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Bell et al
as 5:2011ct03226
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leonard Dunbar
Defendant:
Ronald Bell, Jr., Beverly Perdue, Alvin W. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. NC Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011ct03182
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
NC Department of Correction, Alvin Keller, Robert C. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Jackson et al
as 5:2011ct03162
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Willingham
Defendant:
HL Jackson, D. Davis, Officer Mace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
