Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spates v. Ishee
as 5:2024ct03056
Plaintiff:
Andre Michael Spates
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03005
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Correctional Officer Gray, Correctional Officer Privis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03355
Plaintiff:
Nijel Ramsey Lee
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Mark Fleming, Lieutenant Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023hc02272
Petitioner:
David Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02271
Petitioner:
David Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023ct03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nolon v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03227
Plaintiff:
Ardie D. Nolon and Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Roderick K. Watson and Timothy P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
