Cases 11 - 20 of 196
Travis v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02226
Petitioner:
Douglas Elijah Travis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01372
Plaintiff:
Douglas Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ayers v. Markiewicz et al
as 5:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Ayers
Defendant:
Joseph Markiewicz, Mary Beth Markiewicz and Douglas Weir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Porter v. Medical Staff
as 5:2023ct03195
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Porter and Michael Douglas Porter
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Douglas Duncan
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Fletcher v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Douglas Fletcher
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Briggs v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Douglas Briggs
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ardito, et al. v. Sheppard
as 7:2023cv00270
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
David A. Ardito and Lisa A. Ardito
3Rd Party Defendant:
Executor Joseph Douglas Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
McElveen v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02025
Petitioner:
Aaron Douglas McElveen
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Symmes v. NC Unemployment Office
as 5:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Symmes, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Unemployment Office and NC Work Career Center of Rockingham County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
