Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Wright v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al
as 5:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Trisha L. Wright
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Pelnik Insurance of Cary, NC, Inc. , C. W. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Michael W. Burke, Inc. et al v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 2:2016cv00007
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Burke, Inc, Michael W. Burke and Michael W. Burke, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rankin Bey v. Pittman et al
as 5:2015ct03182
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Capt. Pittman, Officer Ball, Officer Burleson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Burke v. Mitchell
as 5:2015hc02118
Petitioner:
Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burke v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Adele Nicole Burke
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burks v. I.C. System, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Tony Burks
Defendant:
I.C. System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The State of North Carolina v. Burke
as 7:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
The State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Karla Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Thompson-Burke v. Harrison et al
as 5:2013ct03091
Plaintiff:
Christopher Manley Thompson-Burke
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison and Wake County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
