Cases 21 - 30 of 54
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Webb et al
as 2:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Thomas F. "Rick&q Webb and New Lake Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Neal v. Dean et al
as 5:2013ct03055
Plaintiff:
William J. Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Dwayne Dean, L.D. Bethea, Bryant Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 4:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Defendant:
Rick Ryan Pegram, Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
as 5:2012cv00750
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Defendant:
Rick Ryan Pegram, Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney's Office et al
as 5:2012ct03121
Plaintiff:
Demar Worrell
Defendant:
Wayne County District Attorney's Office, Mount Olive Police Department, Branson Vickory , III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Immel
as 5:2012ct03098
Plaintiff:
Morris B. Ellison
Defendant:
Rick Immel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricks v. USA
as 5:2012cv00105
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Travis Andrews Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Garner et al
as 5:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Nona Powers, Stephen Winn, Collin Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Barefoot et al
as 5:2011cv00698
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Rick Barefoot and Unknown Business Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2011cv00697
Defendant:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation, Rick Barefoot and Unknown Business Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
