Cases 31 - 40 of 1,132
Eads v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02031
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Eads
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02014
Petitioner:
David Keandre Dixon
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02016
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Dunston v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02009
Petitioner:
Equan Cornelius Dunston
Respondent:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
England v. Oniya et al
as 5:2024ct03006
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David England
Defendant:
O. Oniya, D. Windley, J. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02278
Petitioner:
Gregory Reeves
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Old Republic Insurance Company v. Tradewind Flight Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Old Republic Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tradewind Flight Services, Inc., D2 Government Solutions, Inc., Darryl Centanni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trenkler v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02274
Petitioner:
Alfred Trenkler
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meyers v. Vancey et al
as 5:2023ct03346
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Vancey, Jason Farmer, Ms. Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
