Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. G.R. Hammonds Inc.
as 7:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
G.R. Hammonds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harleyville Mutual Insurance Company v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Inc., et al.
as 7:2011cv00097
Defendant:
G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Inc. and Landsouth Construction, LLC
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Inc. and G.R. Hammonds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barfield v. Thomas et al
as 5:2011ct03075
Plaintiff:
Billy Eunice Barfield
Defendant:
Sandra Thomas, A. Hammonds and Tywana Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins-Bey v. Alvarado et al
as 5:2011ct03062
Plaintiff:
David C. Jenkins-Bey
Defendant:
Rodolfo Alvarado, Jeremy Roberts, Raymond Eure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsom v. Peterkin et al
as 5:2010ct03178
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard Newsom
Defendant:
Hubert Anthony Peterkin, Gary Hammonds, Hoke County Municipality and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. United States Of America
as 5:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
James W. Hammond
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hammond v. Harriel
as 5:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
James W. Hammond
Defendant:
Henry A. Harriel
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Sealy et al
as 5:2009ct03056
Plaintiff:
Robert Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Ken Sealy, Terry Harris, Jeffery Martin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hammond v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2007hc02108
Petitioner:
James Walton Hammond, Jr
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
