Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Scott v. Sea Tow Services International, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Girlonza Scott
Defendant:
Sea Tow Services International, Inc., Marine Services of Brunswick County, Inc. and Dennis Clay Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant:
Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant:
Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
United States of America v. Clay
as 5:2008mc00013
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Walter Lee Clay
Tolbert v. Duda et al
as 5:2007ct03088
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Tolbert
Defendant:
Sergeant Duda, Sgt. Griffin, Clay Bonde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
