Cases 61 - 70 of 147
Chappell v. Franklin et al
as 5:2018ct03363
Plaintiff:
Jason Ernest Chappell
Defendant:
Officer Franklin, Lt. Swett and Carolinas Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Stewart et al
as 5:2018ct03354
Defendant:
Dr. Lance, C/O Stewart, Male Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Richardson et al
as 5:2018ct03299
Defendant:
Captain Richardson, Racheal Eley, Mr. Sledge and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin County v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00500
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Grimes v. LM Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00370
Defendant:
Cary Ale House, Inc., Concord Mills Ale House LLC, Knoxville Ale House, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Grimes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mullen v. Saber Healthcare Group, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00317
Defendant:
Saber Healthcare Holdings, LLC, Saber Healthcare Group, LLC, Queen City AL Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Claire M. Murphy and Michele Mullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Perritt et al
as 5:2018ct03146
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Defendant:
Brad Perritt, George Baysden, Lt. Oxendine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Warden FCI - II Butner
as 5:2018hc02127
Petitioner:
Benny Wayne Franklin
Respondent:
Warden FCI - II Butner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Hooks
as 5:2018ct03076
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Kenneth E. Lassiter, Thomas E. Asbell, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Normand v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2018ct03037
Petitioner:
Otto Gary Normand
Respondent:
Chloe Anne Reynolds, Kristen W. Peebles, T. Allen Buzzy Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
