Cases 61 - 70 of 181
Simuel v. Harris et al
as 5:2019ct03017
Defendant:
Lisa Nesbitt, Scott S. Harris and Redmond K. Barnes
Plaintiff:
Dontez Lamont Simuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Waters v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lisa Christine Waters
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Campbell v. Cooper
as 5:2018hc02151
Petitioner:
Lisa Campbell
Respondent:
Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879 et al
as 5:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879, Andrew David Horne, Ronald Wayne Ruple and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Nowlin v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2018ct03078
Plaintiff:
Hassie Demond Nowlin
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Guilford County, B.J. Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Probst v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00130
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Lisa Probst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Magary et al v. Wood et al
as 4:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Magary, Sr.
Defendant:
Lisa Wood, Sean Wood and Alycia Kinter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
