Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Schmidt v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Garlan Paul Schmidt
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Schmidt v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03273
Plaintiff:
Derek Schmidt
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03237
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James, Larry Robinson, Anthony Michael Finney and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmidt v. USA
as 7:2019cv00043
Petitioner:
Wilbert Robert Schmidt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017hc02008
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016hc02076
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2014mc00027
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Lawrence P. Schmidt, Futurgegen Company, Commercial Equity Parners, LTD and others
Receiver:
Marion A. Hect
Schmidt v. Stephens
as 5:2010hc02015
Petitioner:
Emil Joseph Schmidt
Respondent:
D.R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ingersoll v. Life Industries Corporation of South Carolina et al
as 5:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Ingersoll
Defendant:
Life Industries Corporation of South Carolina, Grace L. Schmidt and John Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Thompson, et al v. St. Paul Travelers
as 5:2004cv00342
Plaintiff:
Shawna Hazard, Vincent James Gugliemo, Berta Cortan and others
Defendant:
St. Paul Travelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
