Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Tucker v. Hazelrigg et al
as 5:2020ct03169
Defendant:
Nurse William, Jim O'Neill, Advocacy Worker and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Hazelrigg et al
as 5:2019ct03287
Defendant:
Dr. Bowen, Bobby Kimbrough, Federal Medical Prison Center and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Bailey et al
as 5:2019ct03083
Defendant:
Bobby Kimbrough, Jason Adams, Mike Causey and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Medical Staff et al
as 5:2018ct03307
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Defendant:
Dr. Amy M. Leeper, Forensic Psychologists and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Forensic Psychologists et al
as 5:2018ct03297
Defendant:
Sheriff Schatzman, Dr. Amy M. Leeper and Forensic Psychologists
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. United States District Court et al
as 5:2008hc02089
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Defendant:
United States District Court, Terrence W. Boyle, Louise W. Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tucker v. USA
as 5:2008cv00230
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tucker v. U.S. District Eastern Court Judiciary et al
as 5:2008hc02029
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker
Respondent:
U.S. District Eastern Court Judiciary and U.S. Prosecutors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tucker v. United States Attorney et al
as 5:2008hc02025
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Attorney, Felice Corpening, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tucker v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2007hc02202
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Eastern District Court, F. Corpening and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
