Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Moss v. Johnston County et al
as 5:2024ct03179
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bey and Antonio Moss
Defendant:
Johnston County, Johnston County Detention Center, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00620
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Curry
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Curry v. Jackson, et al.
as 5:2022ct03080
Plaintiff:
Reuben Curry
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Denise Jackson, Donnie Raynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. USA
as 5:2019cv00199
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lavanta R. Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rankin Bey v. Fowler et al
as 5:2019ct03026
Defendant:
Thompson, Brad Perritt, Lt. Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Infante et al
as 5:2018ct03326
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Currie Infante, C/O Rogers, Director of Program Baysden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West Lumberton Baptist Church et al v. CSX Corporation et al
as 7:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
Currie Chain Saw, Inc., West Lumberton Baptist Church, C.J.M. Ventures, Inc. and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. and CSX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Currie v. Murphy-Brown LLC
as 7:2018cv00156
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown LLC
Plaintiff:
Adrian T Currie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
