Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Newson v. Branker
as 5:2011hc02247
Petitioner:
Dennis Howard Newson
Respondent:
G. J. Branker
Defendant:
E. Lynn Johnson , Gregory A. Weeks , Elizabeth Keever and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. NC Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011ct03182
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
NC Department of Correction, Alvin Keller, Robert C. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas-El v. Branker et al
as 5:2011ct03178
Plaintiff:
Walic Christopher Thomas-El
Defendant:
G. J. Branker, North Carolina Department of Correction, Steve A. Balog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Branker
as 5:2011hc02175
Petitioner:
Noble Dennis Ali
Respondent:
G. J. Branker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Branker et al
as 5:2011ct03071
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
G. J. Branker, North Carolina Department of Correction, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canady et al v. Branker et al
as 5:2010ct03202
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Canady and Billy A. Trapp
Defendant:
G. J. Branker and Officer Gitto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Street v. Speers et al
as 5:2010ct03191
Plaintiff:
Ansel P. Street
Defendant:
Chaplin Speers, Chaplin Montgomery, Mailroom Supervisor Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbett v. Keller et al
as 5:2010ct03185
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Defendant:
Alvin Keller, Jr., G. J. Branker, Joseph M. Lightsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klinger v. Frye et al
as 5:2010ct03182
Plaintiff:
William Charles Klinger
Defendant:
Kevin Frye, Trina Cook, G. J. Branker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbett v. Branker et al
as 5:2010ct03147
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Defendant:
G. J. Branker and Lt. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
