Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Anderson v. Holder et al
as 5:2013hc02040
Petitioner:
Michael A. Anderson
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Bureau of Prisons , Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Phillip v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012ct03168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roderick Phillip
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011ct03177
Plaintiff:
Marc Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracy Johns, Karen Steinour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldrich v. Johns et al
as 5:2011ct03016
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Aldrich
Defendant:
Tracy Johns, Deborah A. Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matherly v. Johns et al
as 5:2011ct03020
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shane Matherly
Defendant:
Tracy W. Johns, Deborah A. Gonzales, Candice Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HALL v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2010ct03220
Plaintiff:
William B. Hall
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeBrew v. Brooks et al
as 5:2010ct03198
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. DeBrew
Defendant:
Brandon Brooks, P. Collins, Lt. Dodson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2010ct03189
Plaintiff:
Corey Wade
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Purdum v. Johns et al
as 5:2010ct03183
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Purdum
Defendant:
Tracy Johns, Harley Lappin, Kim White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gale v. Lappin et al
as 5:2010hc02215
Petitioner:
Melvin Gale
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Jonathan C. Miner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
