Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Harmon v. USA
as 5:2023cv00401
Petitioner: Dwight Harmon
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harmon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02160
Petitioner: Rashad Harmon
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02019
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248 Civil Commitment of a Sexually Dangerous Person
Jones v. United States et al
as 5:2021ct03158
Defendant: Lawrence Sichel, United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Connors et al
as 5:2020ct03189
Defendant: J. Wade, Director Inch, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff: Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Inch et al
as 5:2019ct03356
Defendant: Counselor Denson, B. Coor, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: Burl Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Officers et al
as 5:2019ct03316
Defendant: Director Inch, Thomas R Kane, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff: Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harmon v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00196
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Audrey Lamm Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Franchi v. Paragon Commercial Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv00591
Plaintiff: Anthony Franchi
Defendant: Paragon Commercial Corporation, Paragon Commercial Bank, Howard Jung and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
O'Hara-Harmon v. Avery We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00044
Plaintiff: Sandra O'Hara-Harmon
Defendant: Sidney Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?