Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Dawkins v. Thompson et al
as 5:2024ct03123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lamar Dawkins
Defendant:
Captain Tanesha Thompson, Captain Powell Wendell, Sergeant Dunia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner:
Lamar Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dennis v. Kerns-Correll et al
as 5:2024ct03033
Plaintiff:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Defendant:
Joyce Y. Kerns-Correll, Warden Williams, Case Manager Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03014
Plaintiff:
Fred Lamar Boyd
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, Captain McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jordan v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02123
Petitioner:
Jovon Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. USA
as 4:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Urquhart v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lamar Urquhart and Benjamin L. Urquhart
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02116
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bright v. Locklear et al
as 5:2022ct03137
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lamar Bright
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Sgt. Sim, Sgt. Walliy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
