Cases 91 - 100 of 962
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. EUDY
as 1:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
BILLY DALE EUDY An individual resident and citizen of North Carolina doing business as EUDYS PIPE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BROWN v. BLUSKY HOLDCO, LLC
as 1:2021cv00974
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
BLUSKY HOLDCO, LLC and BLUSKY RESTORATION CONTRACTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARDINER v. KOCHER
as 1:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GARDINER
Defendant:
KAREN KOCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. TRUSTEES OF ROWAN-CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF ROWAN-CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
JB Sails v. Bruhaha Enterprises
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
JB Sails
Defendant:
Bruhaha Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN et al v. PREFERRED FINANCIAL CORPORATION, LLC
as 1:2021cv00914
Plaintiff:
James Jordan, CBS Insurance, Inc., Employers First Choice Insurance Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Preferred Financial Corporation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAIPHI, INC. et al v. BESURE TESTING, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00883
Plaintiff:
CAIPHI, INC. and CAIPHI EP TESTING, LLC
Defendant:
BESURE TESTING, INC., DR. HENRY GRAUSE and HENRY GRAUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
KOLZET v. INVESTIS DIGITAL, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KOLZET
Defendant:
INVESTIS DIGITAL, INC. and DAVE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TFORCE WORLDWIDE, INC. v. ESC BRANDS, LLC
as 1:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
TFORCE WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
ESC BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WIELAND COPPER PRODUCTS, LLC v. ALLSTYLE COIL COMPANY, LP
as 1:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
WIELAND COPPER PRODUCTS, LLC
Defendant:
Allstyle Coil Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
