Cases 111 - 120 of 2,309
BASS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2022cv01015
Petitioner:
KENNETH JOSEPH BASS, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and ORANGE FOR CHATHAM COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AZAR EL v. HALE et al
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL
Respondent:
JAXSON HALE and UNIT MANAGER DENISE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRACE v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00976
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. GRACE
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRACE v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00977
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. GRACE
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. STATE OF N.C.
as 1:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MURPHY
Respondent:
STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRACE v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. GRACE
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SATTERFIELD v. PERSON COUNTY COURTS
as 1:2022cv00958
Petitioner:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Respondent:
PERSON COUNTY COURTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FORE v. NCDPS DIRECTOR
as 1:2022cv00951
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L. FORE
Defendant:
NCDPS DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FOUST v. USA
as 1:2022cv00942
Petitioner:
JOSEPH KYLE FOUST
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BRIM v. USA
as 1:2022cv00924
Petitioner:
PAUL MATTHEW BRIM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
