Cases 1 - 10 of 18
ROGERS v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2017cv01094
Petitioner:
DERRICK ANTHONY ROGERS
Respondent:
KENNETH E. LASSITER and NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROGERS v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2017cv01017
Petitioner:
DERRICK ANTHONY ROGERS
Respondent:
KENNETH E. LASSITER and NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN-BEY v. SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2015cv00696
Petitioner:
JUAN FITZGERALD ALLEN-BEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2013cv01135
Petitioner:
FRANKIE GRAHAM
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOONE v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2012cv00002
Petitioner:
TRUMAN CALVIN BOONE
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMMONS v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00636
Petitioner:
EARNEST J. SIMMONS
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NELSON v. NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00626
Petitioner:
SCOTT OWEN NELSON
Respondent:
NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOLDMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2011cv00242
Petitioner:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAPP v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF PRISONS
as 1:2011cv00181
Petitioner:
DONALD LEE SAPP, JR.
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OWENS-BEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2010cv00952
Petitioner:
DAMON OWENS-BEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and CASWELL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
