Cases 11 - 20 of 28
AUSTIN v. MCGHINNIS et al
as 1:2019cv00242
Defendant:
JACK A. MCGHINNIS and J. R. TATRO
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN v. MCGHINNIS et al
as 1:2019cv00166
Defendant:
JACK A. MCGHINNIS and J. R. TATRO
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. GREENSBORO POLICE SGT. RYAN 4TH PRECINCT et al
as 1:2018cv00709
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE OFC. UNDERHILL, SHERIFF B. J. BARNES, GREENSBORO POLICE SGT. RYAN 4TH PRECINCT and others
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY LEE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNBAR v. MUNICIPALITY/CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEONARD DUNBAR
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY/CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, COUNTY OF FORSYTH, WALTER MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. ELIASON et al
as 1:2015cv00498
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. COMBS et al
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAACS v. BUTNER MEDIUM 1-FC et al
as 1:2013cv01053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ISAACS
Defendant:
BUTNER MEDIUM 1-FC, US MARSHALS DISTRICT OF GA and FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. DEFRANCO et al
as 1:2012cv01275
Plaintiff:
HENRY MARSHALL BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEFRANCO, DAVID Q. LABARRE and LEROY RUSSELL CASTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OSORIO-CRUZ v. SMITH et al
as 1:2010cv00662
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL OSORIO-CRUZ
Defendant:
LEWIS SMITH, JOHN M. GODFREY, BOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JUNIOR MARSHALL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
