Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
HARTZMAN v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00808
Plaintiff: GEORGE HARTZMAN
Defendant: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $7,127.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY et al
as 1:2014mc00053
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $7,127.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY and $75,499.63 IN FUNDS FROM WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNT NUMER ENDING IN 9276
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $30.38 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ENDING IN 2747, IN THE NAME OF ATLANTIC TRADING COMPANY et al
as 1:2014mc00003
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $30.38 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ENDING IN 2747, IN THE NAME OF ATLANTIC TRADING COMPANY, $3,153.15 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9183, IN THE NAME OF ECAP ENTERPRISES, LLC, $33,141.45 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM TD BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 3645, IN THE NAME OF CARLINGTON, LLC and others
THOMPSON v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al
as 1:2012cv00588
Plaintiff: PHYLLIS ROE EVERHARDT THOMPSON
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC , STEVEN WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC v. FLOWERS
as 1:2012mc00029
Movant: WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC.
Respondent: WILLIAM B. FLOWERS
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. ALLIANCE PP2 FX2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2012mc00016
Plaintiff: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant: ALLIANCE PP2 FX2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ALLIANCE HOLDINGS INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., ALLIANCE HOLDINGS INVESTMENTS II, L.L.C. and others
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2008cv00851
Plaintiff: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant: WALTER H. FREEMAN, ROBERT S. JOLLY and RICHARD P. MCNEELY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?