Cases 41 - 50 of 50
SOLIS et al v. ROWAN BUSINESS FORMS et al
as 1:2012mc00076
Petitioner:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Complainant:
ROBERT MYERS
Respondent:
ROWAN BUSINESS FORMS, RICHARD H. HARDESTY, II, ROWAN PAPER COMPANY and others
CONNER v. DUNCAN, et al
as 1:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
RICHIE H. CONNER
Defendant:
MARK J. DUNCAN and TRIAL AND ERRORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SIMMS v. BALL STREET VENTURES, LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00001
Plaintiff:
BRYAN H. SIMMS
Defendant:
BALL STREET VENTURES, LLC, BALL STREET PARTNERS. LLC, BALL STREET FUND, LLC and others
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. ROGERS
as 1:2011mc00034
Defendant:
DAVID H. ROGERS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. BARLEY
as 1:2010mc00055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
TRACY H. BARLEY
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. RALEIGH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC. et al
as 1:2009mc00056
Plaintiff:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant:
RALEIGH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC., RICHMOND H. HAMILTON, JR. and RALEIGH FUND, LP
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LANE et al
as 1:2009mc00044
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ROBERT E. LANE, WEALTH POOLS INTERNATIONAL, INC., RECRUIT FOR WEALTH, INC. and others
KASTEL et al v. NUVEEN INVESTMENTS INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00646
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. KASTEL and JOAN H. KASTEL
Defendant:
NUVEEN INVESTMENTS INC., ROBERT P. BREMNER, MESIROW FINANCIAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
NEWSON v. PETERKIN, et al
as 1:2009cv00091
Defendant:
HUBERT PETERKIN and HARTFORD INSURANCE CO.
Plaintiff:
DENNIS H. NEWSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2008cv00851
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WALTER H. FREEMAN, ROBERT S. JOLLY and RICHARD P. MCNEELY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
