Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROBINSON et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2020cv00047
Defendant:
A.L. COLLINS, HEATHER R. ALEXANDER, CASSANDRA L. BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
PEGGY M. H. ROBINSON, APLC, LEONARD A. ROBINSON and PEGGY M. HAIRSTON ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. TILLERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00732
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS R. WALKER
Defendant:
REX TILLERSON and DIRECTOR OF PASSPORT SERVICES, DEPT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
COMMON CAUSE et al v. RUCHO et al
as 1:2016cv01026
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE , NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY , LARRY D. HALL and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. RUCHO, DAVID R. LEWIS, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. THE TRULAND GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2014mc00055
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
THE TRULAND GROUP, INC., TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION, PEL-BERN ELECTRIC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. YOUNG
as 1:2009mc00038
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DONALD ANTHONY WALKER YOUNG, ACORN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ACORN II, L.P. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALKER v. WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
as 1:2007cv00099
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL F. WALKER
Defendant:
WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
