Cases 141 - 150 of 222
GADDY v. H&R BLOCK, INC., et al
as 1:2012cv00052
Defendant:
H&R BLOCK, INC., H&R BLOCK SERVICES, INC., HRB TAX GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE M. GADDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLOVER v. JTH TAX, INC.
as 1:2012cv00050
Defendant:
JTH TAX, INC.
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES, et al v. JTH TAX, INC.
as 1:2012cv00020
Defendant:
JTH TAX, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHAMIRA JONES and WILLIAM REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODE v. REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 1:2011cv01152
Plaintiff:
LEHOMA GOODE
Defendant:
REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC., ARCTIC GLACIER INCOME FUND, ARCTIC GLACIER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
MEDPORT, INC. v. GREEN
as 1:2011cv00766
Plaintiff:
MEDPORT, INC.
Defendant:
H. FRANKLIN GREEN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
RXBYTEL, INC. v. PARATA SYSTEMS, LLC, et al
as 1:2011cv00761
Plaintiff:
RXBYTEL, INC.
Defendant:
PARATA SYSTEMS, LLC , MCKESSON AUTOMATION CANADA CORPORATION and ABC CORPS, 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL et al v. FIRST MOUNT VERNON INDUSTRIAL LOAN ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2011cv00695
Plaintiff:
JANICE H. POWELL and GEORGE T. POWELL, JR.
Defendant:
FIRST MOUNT VERNON INDUSTRIAL LOAN ASSOCIATION, ARTHUR G. BENNETT, DALE E. DUNCAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
AUDLEY v. PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 1:2011cv00347
Defendant:
PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AUDLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SAVETT v. SEALY CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
ADAM T. SAVETT
Defendant:
SEALY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. BRONSON et al
as 1:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
CHANTE S WHITE
Defendant:
CURTIS LEE BRONSON , UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
