Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 100
HOSKINS v. COOPER
as 1:2018cv00021
Petitioner: OMAR SHARIFF HOSKINS
Respondent: ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOHAMMAD v. JOINES, et al
as 1:2017cv00635
Defendant: ELON MUSK, DONALD TRUMP, PANSY GLANTON and others
Plaintiff: BASIR RAZZAK MOHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAZZAK v. HERRING et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01391
Petitioner: BASIR MATEEN RAZZAK
Respondent: JOHN A. HERRING, JACK CLELLAND and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GREEN v. COOPER
as 1:2016cv01153
Petitioner: BRANDON HAMILTON GREEN
Respondent: ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CUSH-EL v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00610
Plaintiff: PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant: THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT TAYLOR, PAT MCCRORY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00139
Plaintiff: PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. POOLE et al
as 1:2016cv00108
Plaintiff: ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III
Defendant: KATY POOLE and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv01113
Plaintiff: PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANCIL v. COOPER
as 1:2015cv00879
Petitioner: RONNIE STANCIL
Respondent: ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VAN DYKE v. PADGET et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff: DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant: ZACHARY PADGET, SCOTT GOODSON, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?