Cases 11 - 20 of 153
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2022cv00835
Petitioner:
DAVID FRANCIS CLARK and PREZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MEBANE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ROGERS, CPT JOHNSON, LIEUTENANT BURLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ROGERS, CAPTAIN JOHNSON, LIEUTENANT BURLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SHAWN LINDSEY BRITT, TONY BETHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2022cv00394
Petitioner:
KELSE DEANN CLARK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NEWTON v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL NEWTON
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, CAPTAIN BRITT, TWANKEISH CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETT v. OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF et al
as 1:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK BURNETT
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, SGT. CLARKE, OFFICER BOGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETT v. OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF et al
as 1:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. BURNETT
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION SERVICES BUREAU, FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
