Cases 11 - 20 of 32
SHAW v. USA
as 1:2012cv01340
Petitioner:
JAMES CECIL SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LOPEZ v. USA
as 1:2012cv01321
Petitioner:
ERROL ZELADA LOPEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ESTEP v. USA
as 1:2012cv01322
Petitioner:
TRACY LYNN WILES ESTEP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PITTMAN v. USA
as 1:2012cv01306
Petitioner:
TAJ MAURICE PITTMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JUSTIN v. USA
as 1:2012cv01282
Petitioner:
RODNEY K. JUSTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SHORT v. USA
as 1:2012cv01286
Petitioner:
TRAVIS DESMOND SHORT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CASSADY v. USA
as 1:2012cv01271
Petitioner:
REGINALD JEROME CASSADY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PIPKIN v. USA
as 1:2012cv01288
Petitioner:
JEROME LAMONT PIPKIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00960
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
COBLE, JR v. WILKINS
as 1:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
ERNEST FRANKLIN COBLE, JR
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. WILKINS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and EXAMINER #0469241048
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
