Cases 1 - 10 of 13
FLORES v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
MARCELINA LOPEZ FLORES, GRACIANO LOPEZ and MARCELINO LOPEZ FLORES
Defendant:
ISABEL ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ, GRACIANO LOPEZ FLORES, MIRELLA LOPEZ ALFONSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ET AL
as 1:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL NELSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA, SHERIFF DANNY H. ROGERS, W. GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANDAVERDE v. CLELLAND
as 1:2018cv00839
Petitioner:
ALFONSO MAURICIO LANDAVERDE
Respondent:
JACK CLELLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PENN NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. PIZZA, INC et al
as 1:2017cv01155
Plaintiff:
PENN NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
VIKING PIZZA, INC, MARCUS ALFONSO KEARSE, JUWAN CHRISTOPHER HARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LANDAVERDE v. PERRY
as 1:2016cv01235
Petitioner:
ALFONSO M. LANDAVERDE
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOCKERY v. USA
as 1:2013cv00782
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILBERT ALFONSO DOCKERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SANCHEZ et al v. TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
as 1:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
ERICK GARCIA SANCHEZ , JOSUE CHAN CHAG , MIGUEL A. ROJAS TUMALAN and others
Defendant:
TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
MOORE v. ROCKY MOUNT POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO MOORE
Defendant:
ROCKY MOUNT POLICE DEPT. and NASH GENERAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRIS v. GOBER
as 1:2010cv00504
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHANNE GARRIS, JR.
Defendant:
ALFONSO L. GOBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
