Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Beckham v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Dayshawn Beckham
Respondent:
Mecklenburg County, Gary L. McFadden, Ashley Nicole Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00520
Petitioner:
Nicholas Gregory Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Riddle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
C.J. Wilson, Mark Gouge, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Meguel Greylen Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robinson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Meguel Greylen Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robinson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00510
Petitioner:
Lawrence Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bungardner-Lockamy et al v. Robinson et al
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bungardner-Lockamy, Antonio Lockamy, Michael Tapler and others
Defendant:
Sharod Robinson and Joseph Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teal v. Gouge et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonah David Teal
Defendant:
Mark Gouge, Levi Johnson and Michael Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. McDowell County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Martin Ray Robinson, James Julius Lumpkin, David Kenneth Fowler and others
Defendant:
McDowell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alston v. Herring et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tomayo Alston
Defendant:
John A Herring, FNU Robinson, Micheal Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
